Can We Still Save The Ocean?

The ocean has always been our planet’s beating heart — vast, blue, and endlessly alive. Yet, in the quiet depths, the signs of strain are unmistakable. Human activities have added significant stress to ocean ecosystems, including rising temperatures, acidifying waters, plastic debris, overfished seas, and the reshaping of our coastlines. From coral reefs fading beneath the sun to mangroves uprooted by expansion, and kelp forests disappearing from along our coast, the ocean’s balance has been shaken.

Our impacts are both local and global. Coastal cities push ever closer to the tide, dredging channels and disrupting habitats. The hum of ships and offshore drilling echoes through once-tranquil waters. Rain carries the waste of our land — chemicals, oil, and plastic — into the currents. And in distant waters, unregulated fishing is depleting fish stocks faster than they can be replenished.

Yet amid all this, the ocean endures. It absorbs our excess carbon, tempers our climate, and shelters astonishing biodiversity. It still demonstrates resilience. Coral reefs, given time and care, can bloom again after bleaching, provided the polyps are not killed off by excess heat. Kelp forests can return if their natural predators are in balance. Nature, when allowed to breathe, remembers how to heal.

In celebration of the local American Indian cultures, the Aquarium of the Pacific will host its annual Moompetam American Indian Festival. Credit: Aquarium of the Pacific / Josh Barber

But hope alone will not save the sea. Healing demands unity —our local, national, and global communities choosing to act together with purpose. Reducing emissions, protecting coastal habitats, and rethinking how we harvest from the ocean are not acts of sacrifice, but of justice. Ocean justice means ensuring that coastal and Indigenous communities, who have long lived in harmony with the sea, lead the way forward.

This is our moment to imagine something greater: a new story for the ocean and for ourselves — one written in balance, care, and courage. The tide can turn. The ocean can recover. And if we rise together, we can create a future where both humanity and the blue heart of our world thrive once again.

So, Can We Save the Ocean?

What do Americans believe? Is there a case for hope?

The Ocean’s Question

What can I really do to conserve the ocean?
The answer isn’t one-size-fits-all—it depends on where you are along the continuum, from climate denier to fully committed ocean guardian.

And as we confront this question, we must acknowledge the emotional currents that swirl beneath it: climate anxiety, eco-guilt, and even a quiet sense of despair. These feelings are real—but they can also become powerful motivators for change.

How to Find Balance in the Midst of Climate Crisis | PBS Short Docs

Not everyone begins their climate journey from the same place.
At one end of the spectrum are skeptics—those who struggle to see the ocean’s health as connected to their daily choices. At the other end are the deeply devoted, individuals who have reshaped their lives around protecting our blue planet. Most people exist somewhere in between: they care, but the scale of the crisis feels overwhelming. They recycle, share an article, or sign a petition—small actions that matter, yet often feel insufficient against the magnitude of global change.

Recognizing this continuum is not a weakness; it is a source of empowerment. Conservation is not about perfection but progress. Each step forward, however modest, strengthens the tide of collective action and widens the circle of engagement.

While there have been no major studies specifically examining Americans’ beliefs around the question “Can we save the ocean?”, there has been extensive research on public attitudes toward global warming. These findings offer critical insight into how awareness forms—and how it may translate into action for ocean conservation.

A Nation Awakening to a Warming Reality

Recent polling from Yale’s Program on Climate Change Communication and Gallup shows that most Americans now recognize global warming as real—and increasingly personal. Roughly seven in ten Americans believe global warming is happening, with those who accept its reality now outnumbering skeptics by more than five to one.

For decades, climate change lived at the edges of American consciousness: acknowledged by scientists, debated by politicians, and distant from everyday life. That distance is shrinking. According to the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, public understanding of climate change has reached its highest level since national tracking began, driven largely by lived experience with extreme weather, rising insurance costs, and disruptions to daily life.

As of 2025, approximately 72 percent of Americans believe global warming is occurring—a record high. About 60 percent understand that human activity is the primary cause, while another quarter attributes warming to natural cycles. This shift reflects growing alignment between scientific consensus and public belief, even as significant gaps in understanding remain.

Climate Awareness Across Communities

Climate awareness in the United States is not uniform. Yale’s Climate Change in the American Mind project reveals meaningful differences in perception across racial and ethnic groups—differences shaped by geography, economic vulnerability, and lived experience.

Communities of color consistently report higher levels of concern about climate change than white Americans. Black and Hispanic Americans are more likely to believe global warming is happening and more likely to say it poses a serious threat to their communities. Hispanic Americans, in particular, show some of the highest levels of climate concern in the country. Many report that climate change is already affecting their lives through extreme heat, degraded air quality, water scarcity, and rising food prices.

Early-summer heat waves can pose a danger to farmworkers because their bodies haven’t acclimatized to the high temperatures. | Photo by Etienne Laurent, Seirra club

Black Americans similarly express strong concern and are more likely to recognize that climate change disproportionately harms vulnerable populations. White Americans, while increasingly aware, tend on average to express lower urgency and are more likely to underestimate the level of scientific agreement. While nearly all climate scientists agree that human-caused warming is occurring, only about 58 percent of Americans overall recognize this consensus.

These differences are not merely ideological. They reflect unequal exposure to climate risk. Communities of color are more likely to live in areas affected by urban heat islands, flooding, poor air quality, and aging infrastructure—conditions that make climate change tangible rather than theoretical.

From Abstract Threat to Personal Reality

One of the most striking findings in recent surveys is how many Americans now report direct experience with climate impacts. Nearly half of adults say they have already felt the effects of climate change through extreme heat, wildfires, flooding, or severe storms.

These lived experiences are reshaping public perception. About 65 percent of Americans say they are at least somewhat worried about global warming, and nearly one in three say they are very worried. Climate change is no longer viewed solely as an environmental issue; it is increasingly understood as an economic one. Roughly two-thirds of registered voters believe climate change is affecting their cost of living through higher energy bills, food prices, insurance premiums, and disaster recovery costs.

Yet a psychological gap remains. While most Americans believe climate change will harm future generations and ecosystems, fewer—about 46 percent—believe they themselves will be personally harmed. This disconnect reflects a lingering perception that climate impacts are distant, uneven, or delayed, even as evidence suggests otherwise.

Activists hold up a banner during Pope Francis’s visit to the US. Photograph by Susan Melkisethian, African Arguments.

A Cultural Turning Point

Taken together, these findings reveal a nation in transition. Awareness is high. Concern is rising. Experience is becoming personal. Yet understanding remains uneven, and urgency varies widely across communities.

What is clear is that the old narrative of climate change as a distant or abstract issue no longer holds. From wildfire smoke drifting across cities to heat waves straining power grids, climate impacts are increasingly impossible to ignore.

The Yale data suggest the United States is approaching a cultural threshold—one in which climate change is no longer a future risk but a present condition shaping daily life. How this growing awareness translates into action, policy, and collective responsibility remains one of the defining questions of the decade ahead.

What is certain is this: the climate conversation in America has changed. The nation is waking up—not all at once, but steadily—one heat wave, one storm, one lived experience at a time.

The Emotional Undertow

Let’s be honest: protecting the ocean and adapting to climate change can feel heavy.

Many people carry climate anxiety—a persistent unease about the planet’s future. Others feel guilt, comparing their own efforts to those of activists or scientists who seem to give everything. Some even feel that it’s already too late.

Yet these emotions, painful as they are, reveal our capacity to care. Anxiety shows awareness. Guilt shows empathy. When we channel these emotions into learning, advocacy, or art, they transform from weight to motion.

The key is not to suppress the feelings, but to ride them—like waves—toward meaningful action. I found the insights in Katherine Hayhoe’s book Saving Us, a Climate Scientist Case for Hope and Healing in a Divided World. Her insight have been a great help in understanding the source of my anxiety and providing practical solutions that help me move from despair to developing this website.

Check out her short youtube video.

How can we stay hopeful in the face of the climate crisis? Maybe, we’re asking the wrong question. Katherine Hayhoe on climate anxiety

The following discussion is helpful for organizations to move towards accepting climate change, which is caused by the human race releasing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, and to work towards stopping the burning of fossil fuels while building climate resilience. It is too late to provide a 2 to 2.5oC climate raise

The Kübler-Ross stages of grief, first introduced in her 1969 book On Death and Dying, were initially designed to describe the emotional journey of individuals facing terminal illness. The model has been adapted to reflect the grief of those coping with the environmental loss. Source of Diagram: https://thelossfoundation.org/stages-of-grief/

Clive Hamilton, in his paperWhy We Resist the Truth about Climate Change (published in 2010), studied, for example, global warming denial by trying to understand the lack of decision-making and action. Of course, he reminds us the different conflicts of economic and political interests that do not make it easier for individuals. But his work on the individual if quite fascinating and could be summarized in one sentence : ‘an inconvenient truth may be too difficult to accept, most people choose to ignore it. Draw the parallel with our own death. We know it’s coming, but we only become fully aware of it when it becomes imminent.

Emotional Readiness Mapping for individuals journeying between denial and acceptance of Climate Change

Below are emotional phases in climate engagement and helps individuals, as well as community and organizational leaders assess where individuals or the groups currently stand. By identifying typical barriers and appropriate communication cues, leaders can use of participatory strategies and helps determine readiness for progression toward deeper engagement or adaptation.

Grief Stage: Denial

Prevailing Barrier: Psychological distancing, minimization of risk.

Message Framing Cue: “These changes affect our community now.”

Participatory Lever: Localized education, infographics, serious games

Indicator of Readiness: Willingness to acknowledge local climate impacts

Grief Stage: Anger

Prevailing Barrier: Distrust, blame, perceived unfairness

Message Framing Cue: “Your frustration is valid. Let’s talk about just solutions.”

Participatory Lever Structured dialogue forums, climate assemblies

Indicator of Readiness: Initial openness to hear opposing views or collaborate

 Grief Stage: Pessimistic Bargaining

Prevailing Barrier: Overwhelm, disengagement, symbolic actions

Message Framing Cue: “Small steps matter, but we must act meaningfully together.”

Participatory Lever: Low-threshold involvement (e.g., idea boxes, surveys, consultations)

Indicator of Readiness: Participation in small-scale or token efforts

Grief Stage: Depression

Prevailing Barrier: Powerlessness, grief, withdrawal

Message Framing Cue: “You’re not alone. Together we can make a difference.”

Participatory Lever: Community-building, peer support, creative formats

Indicator of Readiness: Renewed interest in group activity or shared emotional expression

 Grief Stage: Optimistic Bargaining

Prevailing Barrier: Strategic avoidance of deeper change

Message Framing Cue: “These actions are a step forward. How can we do more?”

Participatory Lever: Co-creation workshops, feedback loops, deliberative processes

Indicator of Readiness: Proactive suggestions or demand for deeper, systemic engagement

Grief Stage: Acceptance

Prevailing Barrier: Emotional fatigue, residual uncertainty

Message Framing Cue: “Adaptation is possible. Here’s how we already succeed.”

Participatory Lever: Institutional commitment, scenario planning, youth leadership

Indicator of Readiness: Integration of adaptation into strategies, policies, or long-term vision

Ayana Elizabeth Johnson: Stop Doom-Scrolling, Start Building The Future | The Nature Of Podcast